|
KPI |
 2004 / 05 Target |
 2005 / 06 Target |
 2006 / 07 Target |
| (year-end performance as at 31.3.2005) |
(mid-year performance as at 30.9.2005)
|
|
| (1) | Number of New Public Rental Housing / Home Ownership Scheme (PRH / HOS) flats to be Provided |
|
21 000 (22 000) |
20 000 (11 400) |
|
 |
| (2) | Average Waiting Time for PRH (years) |
|
|
|
|
| Overall |
3 (1.8) |
3 (2) |
3 |
| Elderly |
2
(1.0) |
2 (1.1) |
2 |
 |
| (3) | Annual Average Cost per PRH Unit under Housing Department Management ($) |
|
|
|
|
| Direct management cost |
Below 3,800 (3,731) |
Below 3,700 (3,595) |
Below 4,000[9] |
| Actual maintenance cost |
Below 3,000 (2,128) |
Below 2,800 (1,894) |
Below 2,800[10] |
 |
|
|
|
|
| Domestic |
Below 3 (5.7) |
Below 4.5
(6.36)[11] |
Below 4.5 |
| Commercial |
Below 3 (6.7) |
Below 5 (6.7) |
Below 5[12] |
 |
| (5) | % of Overcrowded Families[13] against Total PRH Families |
|
Below 1.6 (1.0) |
Below 1.0 (0.9) |
Below 1.0 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| PRH |
Below 1.5 (1.7) |
Below 1.5 (2.3) |
Below 1.5 |
| Commercial properties |
Below 6 (6.8) |
Below 6 (7.28) |
Below 7[14] |
 |
| (7) | Average Void Period of Vacated PRH Flat (days) |
|
Below 70 (59) |
Below 70 (61) |
Below 70 |
 |
| (8) | Average Development Lead Time for Housing Projects (months) |
|
60 (60) |
60 (60) |
60 |
 |
| (9) | Average Number of Defects per Flat at Handover |
|
Not exceeding 1 (0.46) |
Not exceeding 0.8 (0.25) |
Not exceeding 0.8 |
 |
| (10) | Accident Rate in Construction Sites (number of accidents per 1 000 workers) |
|
Not exceeding 30 (29.2) |
Not exceeding 25 (22.6) |
Not exceeding 25 |
 |
| (11) | Media Enquiries Handled |
|
|
|
|
General enquiries (within 48 hours) |
95% (100%) |
95% (95%) |
95% |
| | Enquiries requiring the collection of detailed information (within 10 days) |
|
100% (100%) |
100% (100%) |
100% |
 |
| (12) |
Training Investment per Staff Member ($) |
|
2,800 (1,730) |
2,200 (711) |
2,000[15] |
 |
| (13) | Overall Evaluation of Training Course Effectiveness |
|
75% with rating of very effective or above (78%) |
75% with rating of very effective or above (75%) |
75% with rating of very effective or above |
 |
|
11.7 reams per staff member (14.3 reams per staff member) |
7.5% lower than the consumption in 2002 / 03 (78 081 reams)[16] |
10% lower than the consumption in 2002 / 03 |
 |
| (15) | Volume of Domestic Waste Paper Collected from Estates for Recycling (tonnes) |
|
23 500 (16 896) |
16 000 (7 087) |
16 000 |
| |