Chapter 2 : Problems
Perceived
2.1 The HA is the
largest housing provider in Hong Kong. To date, it has provided about
645,000 rental and 300,000 home ownership units. Its construction
programme is huge, with work underway on 132 sites, comprising about
nearly 180,000 new housing units as at end 1999. Capital construction expenditure in 1999/2000
is budgeted at HK$28 billion. In 2000/01 alone, the HA will complete over
90,000 new units. This level of housing production is unprecedented.

2.2 As the largest
housing developer in Hong Kong, the HA has been taking a leading role in
promoting building quality. In the 1990s, we have upgraded quality
assurance in the industry by requiring International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) certification for our contractors and consultants.
We have promoted the employment of trade-tested workers and site safety
campaigns through contract requirements. We have improved construction
productivity and quality through the use of prefabricated components and
large-panel formwork. Public housing designs and buildability have also
been improved with the introduction of the Harmony and Concord blocks.
With the concerted efforts from the Government and the industry, we have
assisted in upgrading the buildability of public housing and the
professionalism of the industry.
Rising Community Expectation
2.3 Given the
community's rising expectation on building quality, the quality agenda
will be broadened to "Total Quality" in the 21st Century. Apart
from satisfying customers' rising expectation in design and engineering
quality, we need to address increasing emphasis on technological and
process improvement. We also need to tackle growing community concerns on
how construction will impact on our workforce, economic competitiveness
and the environment.
2.4 Our recent
indepth diagnosis of building quality problems suggests that there are
some inherent weaknesses in both the construction industry and the public
housing production system, which together compromise building quality. The
particular pressure of the recent production peak has exposed these
weaknesses. These weaknesses and the problems of building quality which
flow from them can be viewed from the perspectives of both stakeholders
and the community. The views of both are set out below to provide a
context for our proposals for change.
Perspective of Stakeholders
2.5 Building is a
complex business, involving inputs and participation from many
stakeholders. In the case of public housing, we may appraise the problems
from the perspectives of three key stakeholders : the industry, the HA and
customers.

|
(a) |
From
the industry's perspective, perceived problems include :
heavy workload and tight construction programmes; cut-throat
competition in tendering; high mobility of workers and
sub-contractors; unfair reward and punishment mechanism; lack of
skilled workers and professionalism; periodic general labour
shortages; changing expectations of customers; lack of mutual trust
with developers; cumbersome and inflexible practices of the Housing
Department (HD).
|
|
(b) |
From
the HA's perspective, perceived problems include : confusion
in roles and responsibilities amongst stakeholders; heavy and uneven
workload and tight completion schedules; lack of partnering with
contractors and consultants; inadequate supervision by consultants
and contractors; overly rigid systems and practices within the HD.
|
|
(c) |
From
the customers' perspective, perceived problems include :
poor workmanship; lack of adequate avenues for recourse against
developers; lack of third-party audit on public housing;
over-emphasis on tender prices rather than quality; lack of
incentive for public bodies to improve and innovate; poor project
supervision; and multi-layered sub-contracting activities. |
Perspective of the Community
2.6 From a macro perspective, the
community expects the industry to perform better in three areas -
|
(a) |
Reducing
construction costs
Hong Kong's building costs are
amongst the highest in developed countries.
Comparison of
private residential construction costs
amongst major developed countries
(August 1998) |
Multi-storey
Buildings |
Hong Kong |
United Kingdom |
Australia |
Singapore |
United States |
High quality |
1,300 -
1,750 |
1,225 |
900 -
1,100 |
1,000 |
850 -
950 |
Medium quality |
1,200 -
1,300 |
1,000 |
850 -
900 |
800 |
700 -
800 |
Ordinary
quality |
1,000 -
1,200 |
850 -
1,050 |
800 -
850 |
700 |
- |
(Source
: |
Levett
& Bailey Chartered Quantity Surveyors and Frankin & Andrews
(Hong Kong) Ltd. All costs are in US$ per Construction Floor Area
(CFA) m2) |
(Note
: |
Costs
may vary as exchange rates fluctuate. Variations in building designs
and regulations in different regions will affect comparisons) |
Indeed, the construction cost of the HA's
rental Harmony blocks increased by nearly 55% between 1994 and 1999.

|
(b) |
Reducing
accidents
Construction sites have traditionally
been regarded as dangerous places. Despite the safety campaigns
launched in recent years, the industry's safety record is poor. In
1998, the number of accidents in construction industry accounted for
nearly 45% of all occupational accidents in Hong Kong and fatal
accidents constituted 80% of the overall total. Inadequate site safety
management, lack of safety awareness amongst workers and supervisors,
and time-based bonus systems may contribute to this.

|
|
(c) |
Reducing
waste
Between 1994 and 1998, the total
volume of construction and demolition material Note
2 increased by 40%. In 1998, about 7,000 tonnes of
construction and demolition waste were brought to landfills each day,
while about 27,000 tonnes of public fill were reused for reclamation
daily.
|
2.7 Some of these problems have existed
for a long time and recent incidents serve as an over-due wake-up call.
They can help the industry to focus on these problems and re-think the
operations. It is time for all stakeholders to tackle these problems
decisively and together to enhance building quality and safety in the new
millennium.
Note
2 |
Construction and
demolition (C&D) material is a mixture of inert and organic
material arising from site clearance, excavation, construction,
refurbishment, renovation, demolition and road works. The inert
material, known as public fill such as excavated soil and rock,
concrete and debris from demolition, is suitable for reuse in
reclamation and site formation works. Some of it can also be used
for recycling into material for construction. The organic non-inert
material called C&D waste such as timber, paper, glass, junk,
general garbage should be disposed of at landfills.
Back
|
|
|