| KPI |
2005 / 06 Target |
2006 / 07 Target |
2007 / 08 Target |
| (year-end performance as at 31.3.2006) |
(mid-year performance as at 30.9.2006) |
|
| (1) |
Number of New Public Rental Housing (PRH) Flats to be Provided |
20 000 (17 150) |
7 200 (2 400) |
16 400 |
 |
| (2) |
Average Waiting Time for PRH (years) |
|
|
|
| |
Overall |
3 (2) |
3 (1.9) |
3 |
| |
Elderly |
2 (1.2) |
2 (1.3) |
2 |
 |
| (3) |
Annual Average Cost per PRH Unit under Housing Department Management ($) |
|
|
|
| |
Direct management cost |
3 700 (3 764) |
4 000 (4 233) |
4 300 [10] |
| |
Actual maintenance cost |
2 800 (2 235) |
2 800 (1 952) |
2 300 [11] |
 |
| (4) |
% of Rent Arrears |
|
|
|
| |
Domestic |
Below 4.5 (4.46) |
Below 4.5 (4.85) |
Below 3.5 [12] |
| |
Commercial |
Below 5 (9.96) |
Below 5 (9.48) |
Below 5 [13] |
 |
| (5) |
% of Overcrowded Families[14] against Total PRH Families |
Below 1.0 (0.8) |
Below 1.0 (0.73) |
Below 1.0 |
 |
| (6) |
Vacancy Rate (%) |
|
|
|
| |
PRH |
Below 1.5 (1.4) |
Below 1.5 (1.7) |
Below 1.5 |
| |
Commercial properties |
Below 6 (7.56) |
Below 7 (9.35) |
Below 7 |
 |
| (7) |
Average Turnaround Time for Vacant Flat Refurbishment (days) |
Not exceeding 50 (45) |
Not exceeding 50 (41) |
Not exceeding 48 |
 |
| (8) |
Average Development Lead Time for Housing Projects (months) |
60 (58) |
60 (59) |
60 |
 |
| (9) |
Average Number of Defects per Flat at Handover |
Not exceeding 0.8 (0.36) |
Not exceeding 0.8 (0.4) |
Not exceeding 0.8 |
 |
| (10) |
Accident Rate in Construction Sites (number of accidents per 1 000 workers) |
Not exceeding 25 (21) |
Not exceeding 25 (11.1) |
Not exceeding 25 |
 |
| (11) |
Media Enquiries Handled |
|
|
|
| |
General enquiries (within 48 hours) |
95% (95%) |
95% (95%) |
95% |
| |
Enquiries requiring the collection of detailed information (within 10 days) |
100% (100%) |
100% (100%) |
100% |
 |
| (12) |
Training Investment per Staff Member ($) |
2,200 (1,449) |
2,000 (232.34) |
1,800 [15] |
 |
| (13) |
Overall Evaluation of Training Course Effectiveness |
75% with rating of very effective or above (78%) |
75% with rating of very effective or above (88.5%) |
75% with rating of very effective or above |
 |
| (14) |
Paper Consumption |
7.5% lower than the consumption in 2002/03 (8.6% lower than the consumption in 2002/03) |
10% lower than the consumption in 2002/03 (75 930 reams) [16] |
10% lower than the consumption in 2002/03 |
 |
| (15) |
Volume of Domestic Waste Paper Collected from Estates for Recycling (tonnes) |
16 000 (13 944) |
16 000 (6 981) |
16 000 |
 |